PLATFORM MIGRATION
A critical platform needs to be replaced without interrupting the business.
The decision is not only how to migrate it, but what to move first, how both systems should coexist temporarily and when the change becomes irreversible.
Independent technical judgement
Technical Second Opinion
Before you commit weeks of development, pressure-test whether you are moving in the right direction.
- One specific decision
- Prior documentation review
- 60-minute video call
- Actionable conclusions
Critical technology decisions
Are you facing a decision that will be hard to reverse?
A technical second opinion is designed for situations where a poor decision can cost weeks of work, budget or avoidable technical debt.
01
Architecture
Is the current approach scalable, maintainable and sustainable over time?
02
Migration
What are the real risks of migrating, and which alternatives should be considered first?
03
Supplier
Are you locked into a supplier, technology or decision that may no longer be the best option?
04
Technical debt
Is carrying more technical debt starting to cost more than addressing it?
05
Performance
Is the issue really in the architecture, the code, the infrastructure or somewhere else?
06
Blocked project
Do you need to decide whether to fix, refactor, replace or rethink the solution?
You do not need another meeting.You need to make a decision.
We examine one specific question.
We compare realistic options.
We identify the relevant risks.
We end with a recommendation.
the meeting is not the outcome
How it works
01
Context
You explain the decision you need to make and the relevant background.
02
Review
I review the information and prepare the key points for the session.
03
Session
A 60-minute video call to analyse alternatives, risks and decision criteria.
04
Recommendation
You receive a summary with conclusions, recommendation and next steps within 48 business hours.
The outcome
By the end you will have a reasoned recommendation, the main risks identified and concrete next steps.
We will not try to analyse your entire system. We will identify the information needed to answer one specific decision properly.
Example based on a real case · Data anonymised
APPLIED EXPERIENCE
Real decisions, not theoretical exercises.
Some decision patterns I have worked with for years.
ARCHITECTURE AND INTEGRATIONS
A responsibility could live in the application, in the ERP or in an external service.
The right option depends on ownership, coupling, cost, dependencies and future evolution.
BLOCKED PROJECT
Architecture, performance, technical debt and supplier issues seem to be part of the same problem.
Before investing more, you need to identify the real constraint and the intervention most likely to change the outcome.
Background
More than 20 years making this kind of decision.
I am Eduardo Martos, Business & Technology Architect and CEO of Natiboo.
For more than two decades I have worked on projects where a technical decision could directly affect the business: critical production platforms, migrations, integrations, e-commerce and digital products with years of evolution behind them.
My work often starts where the answer stops being purely technical: when architecture, cost, risk, timelines, suppliers and business needs have to be balanced.
PROFESSIONAL REFERENCES
People who have worked with me.
Recommendations from professionals I have worked with on complex technology projects through Natiboo.
We have been working with Eduardo and his Natiboo team for years, often on the most complex projects, the kind where you need real technical capability and a cool head to move things forward.
With Natiboo, collaboration has always been very fluid and fully integrated into our day-to-day work. They get involved, understand priorities quickly and contribute with sound judgement, not only technically but also through their understanding of the business and the stage the company is going through. In long-term relationships, that combination makes a real difference.
Natiboo is the kind of technology partner you want to have on complex, long-term projects: calm under pressure, clear in communication and always one step ahead. Easy to recommend.
An independent opinion, with clear limits of scope.
During the second opinion I do not offer or quote for implementation. If later you want help executing it, that is assessed as a separate project and only if you explicitly ask for it.
WHAT I DO
- 01Challenge technical decisions.
- 02Analyse alternatives.
- 03Identify risks.
- 04Define actionable next steps.
- 05Recommend the option I consider most reasonable, and why.
WHAT I DO NOT DO
- 01I do not develop the solution as part of this service.
- 02This is not open-ended consulting.
- 03This is not a full audit.
- 04This is not hourly support.
- 05This is not a commercial proposal.
Technical Second Opinion
250 EUR
VAT included
One focused hour to question a decision that may shape weeks or months of work.
Book a session- 01One specific decision
- 02Prior documentation review
- 0360-minute video call
- 04Follow-up summary with conclusions
If, after reviewing your request, I consider this format unsuitable, I will cancel the session and you will receive a full refund.
A poor technical decision can take months to reveal itself.
A second opinion can help you catch it earlier.
Book a session